Friday, 9 May 2014

Textual analysis on the opening of: Halloween (1978 film)



Halloween is an independent horror/thriller that was released in 1978 and directed by John Carpenter. We meet Michael Myers who is a troubled boy and murders his sister in the opening scene, which was conducted in one continuous shot. The credits last for approximately 2 minutes and then we move onto the 4-5 minute camera shot alongside a point of view shot from Michael where he brutally stabs his sister. The opening also includes a medium-long shot of Michael to establish what the character looks like, which then ends.



            Before any footage, we see a two-minute induction sequence of title credits. The only Mise En Scene would be the pumpkin, as slowly throughout the sequence we zoom into the face of the pumpkin, which in accordance with the title provides information to the spectators what the movie is about. The font title is orange symbolising the pumpkin once again and the idea of Halloween. But what’s intriguing is once again the appearance of orange, gradually fades into red connoting, blood, violence, envy and inevitably death, this is simple but yet purposeful which presents the true meaning of the movie. Not exactly how we interpret the occasion of Halloween. So without seeing any footage of the film, the audience already begin to raise questions, which is a great use of enigma codes, which is what the movie, intends to do.

            Music is an important factor to consider, as the first minute we are greeted by absolute silence, building tension and preparing the audience for a fright, which is stereotypical of a horror flick. As assumed a high-pitched non-diegetic sound then shocks onlookers without any action. In a way the film is messing with its viewers, as there is yet to be any gore or death, but with sharp sound effects we are on the edge of our seats. Although the music was repetitive, once it started there was there were no pauses, the only alteration during the build-up would be the pace and pitch of the music, also with constant outbursts of high pitched sound effects, ensuring the audience is fully engaged. When approaching his sister, with every step Michael takes the chord goes a note lower, maybe not a penultimate climax, but meaningful as these low monotonous chords symbolise death. Something very rare in horror is a long continuous shot, even after the murder has taken place. Although the main act has now ended, the audience are still in fear as the music does not allow you to rest.


            During the course of the opening scene we establish Michael being as the antagonist, and his sister as the victim and a short introduction of his parents near to the end. Despite tracking Michael for the whole opening, not much is given away in terms of characterisation; therefore we are left to interpret our own thoughts on him. For those who don’t acquire the basic background knowledge of the film, simple clues such as Michael being a young character and the shock of him carrying a knife makes the scene even more horrifying. This raises enigma codes and as the most popular conventions is to use children, as this is far more distressing.

            The sister is obviously not the main character, but may foreshadow the type of targets he may go for in the future. A technique which involves the audience is they attach themselves to certain characters, sharing sympathy, due to their imminent death. In addition during the stabbing of his sister, the action is focused on her. Alongside the excruciating diegetic sounds adding up to make a very traumatic experience for the audience.


            To encounter Michael, and see him in flesh creates a substantial amount of confusion for audiences, as they identify an innocent and vulnerable looking boy, after seeing such disturbing events, committed by him, spectators attempt to clear off any emotive feelings, which is quite an odd experience.

            The cinematography implies the shots are limited, as overall there are two accountable shots. The point of view shot with the track camera movement which has very special effect on the scene, as they could have gone with a generic approach and made it more mysterious, however the same atmosphere would not have been created and the overall opening would not have been effective.



            The movement is almost identical to what is said above. Nonetheless to expand on this point there could have been an opportunity for a pan of Michael while obscuring the face. However they keep it consistent to the tracking movement which pays off, as you don’t get to spend that long with the antagonist in other horrors, therefore this gives the audience a new thrill.   





No comments:

Post a Comment